Tuesday – Thursday
8:00 am to 4:00 pm
(closed on holidays)
Chair: Steven Wetzner, MD
Institutional Official: Scott Tromanhauser, MD
Administrator: Betsy Draper
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a group of people formally designated to review and monitor research involving human subjects. The purpose of the IRB is to protect the rights and welfare of individuals who are participating as subjects in the research. The IRB has the authority to approve, disapprove, and require modifications to research projects involving human subjects. Once a project is approved, the IRB must monitor the progress of the ongoing research, prospectively approve modifications, and, if necessary to protect subjects, suspend a research project.
The IRB meets on the 3rd Tuesday of each month at 7:00 am.
Seven business days prior to the IRB meetings at 3:00 pm.
Turnaround time depends on a number of factors, including but not limited to: completeness of submission; meeting dates; type of review; and the investigator’s responsiveness to an IRB request.
Full Board reviews are placed on the next available agenda. Notification of the outcome of the review occurs approximately seven business days after the date of the meeting.
Expedited/Exemption reviews occur approximately five business days after submission to the IRB.
Exemption means that the project is not subject to the requirements of the federal regulations (45 CFR 46). A protocol may be determined to be exempt from IRB review if all procedures fall into 1 or more of 6 specific categories of research described in 45 CRF 46.10(b). A designated IRB reviewer makes this decision.
Full Board review is required for all protocols that are not eligible for exemption or expedited review.
Expedited review means that the convened IRB need not review the proposed research. Expedited review is appropriate for a protocol that presents not more than minimal risk to subjects. The IRB Chair or designated reviewer makes this decision.
Electronically, via www.irbnet.org. Contact the IRB office for further instruction.
NEBH maintains and supports the Institutional Review Board (IRB) utilizing the industry-leading IRBNet suite of tools, bringing electronic on-line IRB submissions to the NEBH research community.
Some helpful tips may be found here:
Yes, if the project meets the criteria for research with human subjects (your IRB office can help you determine this).
Yes. Any activity conducted by an individual who is affiliated with NEBH that involves research on human subjects must be prospectively reviewed by the IRB.
Adverse events that are also unanticipated problems must be reported to the IRB. Unanticipated problems are any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the following criteria (the IRB office can give a more detailed definition):
Any proposed change to the protocol procedures (including subject selection, consent process), personnel, documents (including recruitment ads, study instruments) must be submitted to the IRB for review and approval prior to implementation. Any other changes that may affect a participant’s willingness to participate in the study must also be submitted for prospective IRB review.
Yes, an investigator needs to inform the IRB that a study is being terminated or closed and complete a termination report. A study should not be terminated until all subjects have completed the study and research-related activity has ceased, including subject follow-up, data collection, and/or data analysis.